Wednesday, November 14, 2012

On the sky and infinity

"One, however, of these child instincts, I believe that few forget, the emotion, namely, caused by all open ground, or lines of any spacious kind against the sky, behind which there might be conceived the Sea. It is an emotion more pure than that caused by the sea itself 

Whatever beauty there may result from effects of light on foreground objects,—from the dew of the grass, the flash of the cascade, the glitter of the birch trunk, or the fair daylight hues of darker things (and joyfulness there is in all of them), there is yet a light which the eye invariably seeks with a deeper feeling of the beautiful,—the light of the declining or breaking day, and the flakes of scarlet cloud burning like watch-fires in the green sky of the horizon;

It  is  not  then  by  nobler  form,  it  is  not  by positiveness  of  hue,  it  is  not  by  intensity  of  light  (for  the  sun itself at noonday is effectless upon the feelings), that this strange distant  space  possesses  its  attractive  power.  But  there  is  one thing  that  it  has,  or  suggests,  which  no  other  object  of  sight suggests in equal degree, and that is—Infinity. It is of all visible things the least material, the least finite, the farthest withdrawn form  the  earth  prison-house,  the  most  typical  of  the  nature  of God, the most suggestive of the glory of His dwelling-place."

Modern Painters II, p. 79-81


"And of  these hues, that of open sky is one not producible by human art.  The sky is not blue colour merely,—it is blue fire, and cannot be  painted.

§ 4. Next, observe, this blue fire has in it white fire; that is, it has  white  clouds,  as  much  brighter  than  itself  as  it  is  brighter than the white paper. So, then, above this azure light, we have another equally exalted step of white light. Supposing the value of the light of the pure white paper represented by the number 10, then that of the blue sky will be (approximately) about 20, and of the white clouds 30. But  look  at  the  white  clouds  carefully,  and  it  will  be  seen they are not all of the same white; parts of them are quite grey
compared with other parts, and they are as full of passages of light and shade as if they were of solid earth. Nevertheless, their most deeply shaded part is that already so much lighter than the blue sky,  which  has  brought  us  up  to  our  number  30,  and  all these high lights of white are some ten degrees above that, or, to white paper, as 40 to 10. And now if you look from the blue sky and white clouds towards the sun, you will find that this cloud white, which is four times as white as white paper, is quite dark and lightless compared with those silver clouds that burn nearer the  sun  itself,  which  you  cannot  gaze  upon,—an  infinite  of brightness. How will you estimate that? And yet to express all this, we have but our poor white paper after all. We must not talk too proudly of our “truths” of art: I am afraid we shall have to let a good deal of black fallacy into it, at the best."

 (Modern Painters vol. IV, p. 51)

No comments:

Post a Comment