Friday, December 14, 2012

Nature discrepancy between the attainable brilliancy of colour and light

It is to be observed, however, in  general, that  wherever in brilliant  effects  of  this  kind,  we  approach  to
anything like a true statement of nature's colour, there  must  yet  be  a  distinct  difference  in  the impression   we   convey,   because   we   cannot approach her light. All such hues are usually given by  her  with  an  accompanying  intensity  of  sunbeams  which dazzles  and  overpowers  the  eye,  so  that  it cannot  rest  on  the actual colour, nor understand what they are; and hence in art, in rendering  all  effects  of  this  kind,  there  must  be  a  want  of  the ideas of imitation, which are the great source of enjoyment to the ordinary observer; because we can only give one series of truths, those of colour, and are unable to give the accompanying truths of  light;  so  that  the  more  true  we  are  in  colour,  the  greater, ordinarily, will be the discrepancy felt between the intensity of  hue and the feebleness of light.

But the painter who really loves nature  will  not,  on  this  account,  give  you  a  faded  and  feeble image, which indeed may appear to you to be right, because your feelings  can  detect  no  discrepancy  in  its  parts,  but  which  he knows   to   derive   its   apparent   truth   from   a   systematized falsehood.  No;  he  will  make  you  understand  and  feel  that  art cannot  imitate  nature;  that  where  it  appears  to  do  so,  it  must malign her and mock her. He will give you, or state to you, such truths as are in his power, completely and perfectly; and those which he cannot give, he will leave to your imagination. If you are acquainted with nature, you will know all he has given to be true, and you will supply from your memory and from your heart that  light  which  he  cannot  give.  If  you  are  unacquainted  with nature, seek elsewhere for whatever may happen to satisfy your feelings;  but  do  not  ask  for  the  truth  which  you  would  not acknowledge and could not enjoy.

MP I, p. 289

No comments:

Post a Comment